Political Parties

The Nature of Cleavages in Western European Democracies

CONCEPTS

Comparison

Models of Political Development

Verney

Lijphart Models

Social Cleavage

Lijphart's 7 Cleavages

USDOP

spatial analysis

2002 French Pres elections

2003 Israeli election

Lipset and Rokkan

 

Most political systems that strive to be legitimate (or claim to be) argue that they represent "the people".  Yet most political philosophers argue that "the people" is a fiction, created by those in power to justify their actions.  

In the second lecture, we talked about the concept of linkage (connecting people to government) and how interest articulation is the cornerstone of linkage. We also recognized that systems of representation, election, and parties, are the keys to this linkage.

We thus need to know about differences in systems of representation, differences in electoral systems, and differences in party systems in various countries.

Unfortunately there are great many countries, each with its unique culture, history, contemporary problems, and unique set of linkage mechanisms.

By exploring differences in some countries, perhaps by the end of the semester we'll be able to make some generalizations that will demonstrate a sophisticated knowledge of political parties and elections!

Hopefully you now know at least a little about the differences between parliamentary systems (Westminster or Consensus) and presidential systems.

In exploring difference in systems we need to make some comparisons between:

electoral systems

One of the processes we will need to explore is how "the people" are "created" in electoral systems. Ie., what are the electoral mechanisms that generate "the people".

party systems

We'll also need to know how the electoral system encourages or discourages the development of political parties. 

types of parties

We'll need to know about the types of parties that develop in various systems.

the people

Before that, we also need to know a little bit about "the people".

The Dalton article

In his article "Social Bases of Party Support", Dalton claims that historical experiences have deeply etched their features on the framework of party systems in Europe.  Later this week, we will begin explore how historical experience has shaped the development of the American party system.  

But first, let's look closer at European party system development!

According to Lipset and Rokkan, two major "revolutions" shaped the national and socio-economic development of Europe as a whole and thus shaped the nature of European parties:

1)  the National Revolution; and

2) the Industrial Revolution

 

The National Revolution

The National Revolution is linked the process of nation building which we discussed earlier in the semester. (Access the link: Models of Political Development).  

Note that the first three steps in the sequence of political development emphasize the building of the nation:  identity, legitimacy, and penetration.

The National Revolution, in turn, created two types of cleavages in European societies:

1)  the center-periphery cleavage; and 

2)  the church-state cleavage

 

The center-periphery cleavage is a clash between the dominant national culture of a country against ethnic, linguistic or religious minorities throughout the country (or more normally concentrated in particular areas).  Conflicts generally occur over disparate values and the desire to preserve one's unique cultural identity.

In Europe, this cleavage still exists today in countries as diverse as Britain and Spain.  (Later we will explore regional parties in both places:  Plaid Cmyru (a Welsh National Party)  and the Basque National Party of Spain.

 

The church-state cleavage often pitted the forces of nationalism, secularism and Protestantism against the forces of the Catholic Church and "the old regimes".  This occurs historically in part due to the fact that the Catholic Church often enjoyed "corporate privileges of place" in traditional monarchical regimes. That is, they were part of the ruling elite.  It is reflective of the role that the Reformation played in the development of European society.  Nationalist movements, often fueled by a rising entrepreneurial class, and often Protestant, challenged the traditional patterns of power in many countries. Differences between countries (notably northern vs. southern Europe) in the power of the Reformation generally create differences in the power of churches (national vs. Catholic) in the different countries.

The church-state cleavage is less powerful today than a century-and-a-half ago although vestiges of it remain in the political parties of some of the countries throughout Europe:  

Germany's Christian Democratic Union    

The Netherland's Christian Democratic Appeal

 

The Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century introduced dramatic changes in social relations.  Vast wealth could be generated without the need for vast amounts of land (the traditional source of wealth in pre-Industrial societies) and people could drastically alter their lifestyle and prospects by moving into urban areas to sell their labor. The dynamics of these new sets of relationships generated two cleavages in most European societies:

1)  the land-industry cleavage; and

2)  the owners workers cleavage 

The land-industry cleavage often separated those who power was based upon rural and agrarian interests versus those who interests were tied to the rising industrial,  entrepreneurial class.  While the land-industry cleavage is usually about economic power (falling for agrarian interests and rising for industrial interests) it is also often a battle over values.  Agrarian and rural interests often attach special meaning and value to the land and nature and see industrialism and urbanization as factors which contribute to the "downfall" of an idealized rural life.

The Center Party of Norway

The owners-workers cleavage reflects the different interests of those (in Marxian terms) who own the means of production (owners)  and those who must sell their labor (workers).  In many countries, where popular participation in government was limited to a few, labor unions often became the vehicle for the articulation of worker interests.  As the franchise expanded, certain political parties worked hand-in-hand with labor unions to fight for the interests of the working class. Other parties arose to fight for the interests of owners, small businesses, and the self-employed.

Many European parties have roots in this cleavage:

The Labour Party of Britain,  the Conservative Party of Britain,  

and the Communist Party of France,  

 Under the Microscope:   Sweden