Presidential Character
"Every story of Presidential decision-making is really two stories: an outer one in which a rational man calculates and an inner one in which an emotional man feels. The two are forever connected. Any real President is one whole man and his deeds reflect his wholeness".


For Barber, understanding presidential actions is aprocess of understanding:

1) the character, style, and world view of the individual who occupies the office;

2) the climate of expectations (the public connection); and

a) reassurance
b) sense of progress and action
3) legitimacy

Sound familiar?



3) the power situation (the institutional connection/ pendulum of power)



Synopses of the Character Types

Passive Positive

This is the receptive, compliant, other-directed character whose life is a search for affection as a reward for being agreeable and cooperative rather than personally assertive. The contradiction is between low self-esteem (on grounds of being unlovable, unattractive) and a superficial optimism. A hopeful attitude helps dispel doubt and elicits encouragement from others. Passive-positive types help soften the harsh edges of politics. But their dependence and the fragility of their hopes and enjoyments make disappointment in politics likely.

Passive Negative

Why is someone who does little in politics and enjoys it less there at all? The answer lies in the passive-negative's character-rooted orientation toward doing dutiful service; this compensates for low self-esteem based on a sense of uselessness. Passive-negative types are in politics because they think they ought to be. They may be well adapted to certain nonpolitical roles, but they lack the experience and flexibility to perform effectively as political leaders. Their tendency is to withdraw, to escape from the conflict and uncertainty of politics by emphasizing vagues principles (especially prohibitions) and procedural arrangements. They become guardians of the right and proper way, above the sordid politicking of lesser men.

Active Positive 

There is a congruence, a consistency, between much activity and the enjoyment of it, indicating relatively high self-esteem and relative success in relating to the environment. The man shows an orientation toward productiveness as a value and an ability to use his styles flexibly, adaptively, suiting the dance to the music. He sees himslef as developing over time toward relatively well defined personal goals--growing toward his image of himself as he might yet be. There is an emphasis on rational mastery, on using the brain to move the feet. This may get him into trouble; he may fail to take account of the irrational in politics. Not everyone he deals with sees things his way and he may find it hard to understand why.

Active Negative

The contradiction here is between relatively intense effort and relatively low emotional reward for that effort. The activity has a compulsive quality, as if the man were trying to make up for something or to escape from anxiety into hard work. He seems ambitious, striving upward, power-seeking. His stance toward the environment is aggressive and he has a persistent problem in managing aggressive feelings. His self-image is vague and discontinuous. Life is a hard struggle to achieve and hold power, hampered by the condemnations of a perfectionist conscience. Active-negative types pour energy into the political system, but it is an energy distorted from within.



Active-Negative Presidents and
the Presidential Power Equation


Barber:

"I think Nixon was neither an accidental nightmare nor an automaton who rise and fall were inherent in "the system". He will be back, in his essentials, the next time the public elects an active-negative President....The American people had every opportunity to know what they were getting. They elected Nixon despite the most abundant evidence ever available regarding the character of any Presidential candidate".



Active-negative presidents give us a good opportunity to explore
the entire presidential power equation approach.

Their "character" shapes:

1) the institutional connection-- relations between themselves and
the other branches of government (the pendulum of power)


2) the popular connection--relations between the people and the president


3) the action connection-- the way they utilize opportunities
4) the action connection---the actions they take



We thus need to know about the president's character,
where the pendulum of power is at any given point in time,
and the climate of expectations


Active-Negative Presidents

(Wilson, Johnson, Nixon)

the problem of self-esteem:

1) parents who demand perfection

2) children either are told they are or feel inadequate

3) have an all or nothing component to their actions

4) always trying to control their aggression

5) always have the temptation to fight or quit

6) often see the world in terms of conspiracy and/or chaos

7) feel they live in a dangerous world where you either fight or quit

they all RIGIDIFY


The process of rigidification:

1) they fight against giving in

2) they think that if they work harder things will change

3) they view themselves as alone

4) they appeal to faith

5) the identify an enemy





Richard Nixon as Archetypal Active-Negative

a great deal of work without much enjoyment

"I find it especially difficult to answer the question, does a man "enjoy" crises? I certainly did not enjoy the ones described in this book in the sense that they were "fun". Any yet, life is surely more than simply the search for enjoyment in the popular sense. We are all tempted to stay on the sidelines, to live like vegtables, to concentrate all our efforts on living at greater leisure, living longer, and leaving behind a bigger estate. But meeting crises involves creativity. It engages all a man's talents. When he looks back on his life, he has to answer the question: did he live up to his capabilities as fully as he could? Or were only part of his abilities ever called into action? Did he risk all when the stakes were such that he might win or lose all? Did he affirmatively seek the opportunities to use his talents to the utmost in causes that went beyond personal and family considerations?

A man who has never lost himself in a cause bigger than himself has missed one of life's mountaintop experiences. Only in losing himself does he find himself. Only then does he discover all the latent strengths he never knew he had and which would otherwise have remained dormant".

the grueling campaigner who succeeded by "slowing the pace" in 1968

life isn't about enjoyment, but about conquest

Nixon as self-manager

"Nixon's conscience--his politically relevant ideal self--remains obscure as long as we try to find it in ideology, philosophy, allegiances to groups, places, and roles. Yet he is obviously a highly moralistic man, constantly preaching about how one should arrange his feelings. I think that it is the "how-ness" rather than the "ougthness" of his interior life that gives the clue to understanding, at a different level, the Nixon self-image. His energies are taken up with the struggle to resolve certain fairly continuous conflicts among character forces. The model is not that of progressively approaching an ideal, but of managing, controlling, and molding the tensions among competing drives. These conflicts are externalized in ways which give an impression, when viewed from without, of inconsistency or vagueness. But when one looks at the right place--at conflict management rather than goal attainment as the chief problem--there is a more coherent structure to the Nixon personality. For him, the task of raising self-esteem is less a matter of positive development than of success in warding off dangerous tendencies he discovers within himself. In this light, his constant attention to the arrangements of his inner life represents the role of conscience as protector, as self-maker, as climbing guide picking a characterological path up the mountainside".

Nixon world view

human nature--- people as untrustworthy

world view--dominated by anti-communism (Hiss case)
enemies

Nixon style

no personal relations
little rhetoric
homework is the key


Keys to Nixon:

childhood

college


Richard Nixon's character thus influences his approach to the presidency
and ultimately his presidency:

1) his attitude towards "enemies" leads to an enemies list and a desire to "get" them
2) his focus on his place in history leads to Watergate and US policy in Viet Nam


Okay, okay. For all of you Watergate in ancient history!!!
Here is a quick look at the flow of events through
Time magazine!

Time 1972, Time 1973, Time 1974


Here is an excerpt from Nixon's resignation speech.
Does his "character" come through?
Sometimes I have succeeded and sometimes I have failed, but always I have taken heart from what Theodore Roosevelt once said about the man in the arena, "whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again because there is not effort without error and shortcoming, but who does actually strive to do the deed, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumphs of high achievements and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly."




Passive-Positives: The Lure of Poltiical Love

"Politics is in many ways a loving business....For those at the margins of politics, 

love lifts the issues above questions of morality and power to a plain 

of human concern: politicians continually reconstitute a sense of 

community, of sharing, of simple affection and mutuality 

as they excude the balm of political love".



Passive-positives are responders, not initiators or pushers. 

They go about their job with "affectionate hopefulness".



They are often "nice guys who finish first, only to discover that not everyone is a nice guy".



Taft and Harding are archtypal Passive-positives


Warren G. Harding

from the funeral oration of C. E. Hughes:
"President Harding had no ossification of the heart. He literally wore himself out in the endeavor to be friendly".


multiple affairs (Nan Britton)

the Duchess


Teapot Dome scandal


"Harding and Taft had in common the passive-positive's open, compliant and vulnerable character. They were different people in many other ways: Taft the juduicious exemplar of propriety, Harding the political playboy. But in character each reached out for love and sought to win it by being a winning personality. The passive-positive type lives in a marketplace of affection, trading bright hellos for smiles in return. What threatens the fragile structure of that adaptation is conflict and particularly conflict at close quarters...The passive-positive character is built around surfaces; when the surface begins to crack, collapse is imminent.

Yet there is in this Presidential orientation a theme of great importance, resonating with strong popular needs. The loving uses of ppolitics are, compared with true love, superficial and fleeting. But for people in search of community, they provide a refreshing hopefulness and at least some sense of sharing and caring. That can be a motive for joining in politics, an emotional reason for staying in. The danger is its exaggeration: in a President-people romance that diverts popular attention from the hard realities of politics and twists the President's own thinking from his larger purposes to his dear friends".



The Reagan Prediction


Climate of Expectations:

"dominated by the tide of reaction against too long and hard a time of troubles, too much worry, too much tension and anxiety....Reagan came on as a friend, a pal, a guy to reassure us that the story was going to come out all right"
Power situation:

"fragile...having won in an election with the lowest turnout in 32 years".
Style:

"dominated by rhetoric, with little interest in homework on the issues and little taste for the charms of personal negotiation...particularly if they involve an element of disagreement or confrontation. Further, his rhetoric is essentially ahistorical and apolitical . He is bound to contribute to the ever widening gap in American politics between speech and meaning".
Worldview:

"despite various attributions of ideology, would be simpler than supposed: He is a Republican millionaire and hangs around with those folks...As long as Reagan's business friends are happy with moderation, he will be, too".
Character:

"Passive-positive. That meant he would be definitely no Nixon--not a rigidified compulsive. Rather the danger was in his type's tendency to drift, particularly with forces in the close-up environment. The danger is confusion, delay, and then impulsiveness".



Time analysis of Reagan


"Thus if there were those who stepped into the Reagan years expecting him to be the rigid ideologue his opponents had described him to be, or a withdrawn, philosopher-king President like his hero Calvin Coolidge, or a go-get-'em results achiever like the Roosevelts, they were wrong. They had significantly misdirected their attention to the wrong clues because they had begun with the wrong questions. Reagan was a passive-positive linked through his extraordinary rhetorical style to a public ready, for the moment, for just such a hopeful and reassuring personality. That combination would turn out to be the simplist and the most significant thing to point out as the world rolled over towards 1984'.





"...understanding the "institution" of the Presidency tells you far less than you want to know, and provides only the shape of the stage and the arrangement of the furniture on and around which the action will take place. Theory which fails to reach the person of the Presient will fall short of useful prediction and into the gap will step whatever speculations politicians can generate, as they struggle to bring power to bear on urgent problems".