|
|
The Ruritania Times |
|
vol.3, no. 30 Committed to Democratizing Ruritanian Society
Party Stands Hold the Key to Election Victory
In a "Responsibile Party System" Stands Actually Matter
In a speech to The Shanorewni
Chamber of Commerce, Professor Jon Kendlander, head
of RNUSSRC's Trotter Poll, explained to the audience
the role of party manifestos in the Ruritanian
electoral process. According to Kendlander, the
National Council on Reconciliation (NCR) made a conscious decision to try to
implement a "responsible party model"
electoral system in Ruritania. "The NCR
was dominated by people who believe in democratic theory. They asked
themselves the question: 'How do you encourage meaningful participation in
politics at the electoral level? Their answer was a system of elections
which would bring real issues to the people, present them with a range of
alternatives, and then register the public's opinion via the ballot box.
Then, after the election, compromises could be worked out among the various
representatives of ideas. They basically decided that to achieve these
objectives one needed a parliamentary system with multi-member districts and multiple parties capable of reflecting the diversity
of opinion in Ruritanian society. You then needed a
way for these opinions to be accurately reflected. After much research
and discussion, the NCR opted for the "single transferrable
vote" system". In response to a question from the audience, Kendlander stated that the NCR never once thought of
copying the American system of election which he characterized as "overly
simplistic and issue free popularity contests structured around advertising and
not politics". According to Kendlander
"American politics is really a fine example of the hyperpluralist
notion that politics and economics become inseparable. American elections
are now all about two giant corporate behemoths (the Republican and Democratic
corporations) try to sell their products (candidates) to consumers (voters)
through advertising. There's hardly a mention of any issue!
American elections are all about who has the best negative ads!". For Kendlander
American public opinion is also very skewed.
"Americans pay so little attention to politics,
they are easily swayed by negative ads. Various writers have called it
the non-ideological electorate, I call it a lazy electorate!".
He went on to explain such things as the increase in the number of independents
and weak partisan identifiers and contrasted the current state of American
politics with Ruritania's: "We in Ruritania see the upcoming elections as very
important. Voters realize that this election will probably set the
country off on a direction it will take for decades. Perhaps
Environment, Entrepreneurialism Two Key Stands
Two of the issues which resonate with Ruritanian voters are issues related to the questions: "What is the tradeoff between economic develop and the environment?" and "In moving towards a more open economic system, how active should the central government be in developing new enterprises?". While the two issues may seem separate, they are intertwined for when answering these questions, the costs of possible answers and the possible negative or inverse relationship between the two becomes apparent. Strong environmental positions can cost money and some of the approaches can create government organizations that could inhibit the development of enterprises. Environmental regulations could make it prohibitive for some small businesses to develop. Yet it also seems that unlimited enterprise development could have disastrous consequences for the land and the environment in general. In a country such as ours, with a strong tie to the land, how do you balance these two competing factors?
Reindeer Prepare for
There is now palpable tension in
All Things Considered
V. Dannisdotter of Valtala writes: "While the Scandinavian Cup is
exciting, why does it seem to take on such political overtones?"
M. Klednann, ATC: "Dear V., where have you
been for the last 50 years? Ever since the end of World War II most
countries have "gone to war" on the sports field rather than the
battle field! Rather than thousands of dead bodies we now have sprained ankles
and broken arms--a great trade-off! Didn't you watch the Olympics for
years when the