Ruritanian Party Stands

Socio-Economic Cleavage

Government vs. Private Ownership

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP			X	X
COM		X
CON								X
LIB							X
NSF								X		X
OPP								X
PEA									X
RLP			X
SHP								X
SOC			X

Governmental ownership.........................................................................private ownership

Strong vs. Weak Government Role in Planning

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP			X	X
COM		X
CON							X
LIB								X
NSF									X
OPP								X
PEA		X
RLP			X
SHP							X	X
SOC				X

Strong role……………................................................................................................weak role

Support vs. Opposition to the Redistribution of Wealth

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP			X
COM	X
CON									X
LIB					X
NSF									X
OPP							X
PEA		X
RLP			X
SHP					X	X
SOC		X			X

Support for ……….................................................................................................Opposition to

Expansion vs. Resistance to Social Welfare Programs

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP		X	X
COM	X
CON								X
LIB			X
NSF							X
OPP						X
PEA				X
RLP	X
SHP					X
SOC		X			X

Support for ………...................................................................................................Resistance to

Religious Cleavage

Support of liberal social policies

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP							X		X
COM	X			X
CON								X
LIB			X
NSF										X
OPP						X
PEA								X
RLP			X
SHP						X
SOC			X

Strong support for divorce, abortion, birth control.........................................................opposed to

Cultural-Ethnic Cleavage

Supportive of Cultural/Ethnic Diversity

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP				X			X
COM			X
CON						X
LIB								X
NSF										X
OPP				X
PEA								X
RLP	X
SHP			X				X
SOC			X

Pro-diversity......................................................................................................Opposed to diversity

Urban-Rural Cleavage

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP			X
COM			X				X
CON						X
LIB								X
NSF									X
OPP			X
PEA								X		X
RLP					X
SHP							X
SOC					X

Pro-urban…...........................................................................................................................Pro-rural

Regime Support Cleavage

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP	X
COM						X
CON							X
LIB					X
NSF								X		X
OPP						X
PEA			X					X
RLP		X
SHP			X		X
SOC							X

Pro-regime…...................................................................................................Not Supportive of Regime

Foreign Policy Cleavage

Relations with Sweden

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP					X		X
COM					X
CON						X
LIB				X
NSF										X
OPP				X
PEA								X
RLP	X
SHP				X
SOC			X

Good relations….......................................................................................................Animosity towards

Joining Common Market

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP		X	X
COM									X
CON						X
LIB					X
NSF										X
OPP			X
PEA			X		X
RLP						X
SHP					X
SOC			X

Pro-Common Market….................................................................................Anti-Common market

Relations with Islamic World/Muslims

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP								X
COM				X
CON						X
LIB				X
NSF										X
OPP				X
PEA				X
RLP						X
SHP			X
SOC					X

Good relations…....................................................................................................Animosity towards

Materialist-Post-Materialist Cleavage

Environment

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP		X		X
COM	X			X
CON							X
LIB		X
NSF			X						X
OPP				X
PEA		X
RLP					X
SHP			X		X
SOC			X	X

Green ….............................................................................................................Not Supportive

Attitudes Towards Women

Party	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
CDP		X	X
COM		X
CON						X
LIB	X
NSF										X
OPP			X
PEA					X
RLP	X
SHP	X
SOC			X

Equality …............................................................................................................Non-equality