|
|
Academic Credit: 3 sem. hrs.
Catalogue Description: This course in the theory and practice of supervision is designed to explore essential concepts and skills necessary in providing leadership for the improvement of teaching and learning. Emphasis will be placed on concepts and methods of the scholar-practitioner providing leadership in the supervisory task areas and building learning communities through critical reflection.
Course Objectives: Upon completion of the course, the student will accomplish the objectives listed under the following categories: Knowledge:
Skills:
Textbook: SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach (Eighth Edition/2010) by Carl D. Glickman, Stephen P. Gordon, and Jovita M. Ross-Gordon.
Course Requirements: 1. Class attendance and participation (e.g.: reading weekly chapter assignments in preparation for in-class discussion, etc.) considered in final grade. 2. District/School Teacher Evaluation Analysis Project & Report (5 to 7 pages, typewritten, double-spaced.) Narrative format to include: a. Explanation of District or Building Teacher Evaluation Policy and Procedure. Describe any policies and all existing procedures connected with your district’s/building’s teacher evaluation program. Include sample evaluation forms used by the school or district in an appendix section. b. Evaluation of the District’s or Building’s Policy and Procedure. Objectively note strengths and weaknesses based on information contained in the textbook and from class lectures. Comment on the district/school evaluation forms, job targeting procedures, board policy, master contract implications, and due process procedures connected with the teacher performance evaluation program. c. Reaction to the Policy/Procedure. Gather reactions from the district’s/ building’s teachers and administrators (minimum of two (2) individuals from each group). Summarize the findings together with a personal reaction to your own experience of the evaluation process. Sample interview questions attached.
d. Recommendations for Improvement based on
“b” and “c” above. Finally include comments as to how you think the
district/school might improve the entire teacher evaluation process based on
the knowledge gained from your assigned reading and class
lectures/discussions. 3. Position Paper/Platform Statement (4 to 5 pages, typewritten, double-spaced) a. Read textbook chapters 1 (SuperVision for Successful Schools), 2 (The Norm: Why Schools are as They Are), 3 (The Exception: What Schools Can Be), 4 (Adult & Teacher Development within the Context of the School:Clues for Supervisory Practice), 5 (Reflections on Schools, Teaching, and SuperVision), 6 (Supervisory Behavior Continuum: Know Thyself), 7 (Developmental Supervision: An Introduction), 8 (Directive Control Behaviors), 9 (Directive Informational Behaviors), 10 (Collaborative Behaviors, 11 (Nondirective Behaviors), 12 (Development Supervision: Theory & Practice), 14 (Observing Skills), 15 (Research & Evaluation Skills pp. 274-280 only/section dealing with Teacher Evaluation), 16 (Direct Assistance to Teachers), and 18 (Professional Development). Give special attention to Chapter 5’s Supervisory Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire - Pp. 100-103 and Appendix “A” What is your Educational Philosophy? - Pp. 483-487. A sample optional journal form is attached which may be duplicated to record notes for this project and for weekly in-class discussion of assigned chapters. b. Prepare a position/reflection paper identifying what you consider to be the significant/important ideas for effective supervision based on your reading and in-class discussion of the assigned chapters in “a” above. Be sure to include your rationale for the ideas presented in the paper.
c. Describe how you think an
effective school supervisor/building administrator should incorporate
these ideas (from “b” above) into his/her professional practice.
4. Clinical Supervision Model Simulation. Practice and demonstrate the role of supervisor in the clinical model’s pre-conference, observation, and post-conference stages/steps. In small groups, one member will act as the teacher presenting a 10 to 15 minute mini-lesson. Other group members will facilitate the role of students and provide feedback (based on course content) regarding the supervisor’s performance in the pre- and post-conference stages/steps. The teacher participant will provide feedback as to how the supervisor made him/her feel during the simulation experience. Feedback forms to be completed by group members will be provided by the professor for each simulation. Feedback forms and the simulation supervisor’s notes will be collected and reviewed by the professor after each simulation. All materials will be shared with the supervisor participant in the following class meeting. Students will receive credit for each feedback form completed. Due Date: Schedule to be created in class. (20% of grade) 5. Exam/Knowledge Check – (30% of grade)
Exam Grading Scale PLEASE FEEL FREE TO APPROACH ME WITH QUESTIONS, FOR ASSISTANCE, ETC., BEFORE AND/OR AFTER CLASS SESSIONS, BY PHONE OR E-MAIL. |
|
Rev. Joseph Massucci, Ph.D. |