PHL 315 - MEDICAL ETHICS
Lawrence P. Ulrich, Ph.D.
Lawrence.Ulrich@notes.udayton.edu
A MODEL ADVANCE DIRECTIVE

"A MODEL ADVANCE DIRECTIVE"
Reprinted from
The Patient Self-Determination Act:
A Training Program for Health Care Professionals
by
Lawrence P. Ulrich, Ph.D.
(Breckenridge Bioethics, 1991)

Introduction:

The following outline is intended as a model which can be used in drafting an advance directive. It contains suggestions of items which can be incorporated into a document which one wishes to make both credible and specific. It can stand alone or be used as a supplement to an official form which one's local state may mandate as part of its advance directive legislation.

It can also be used to give specific directions to one's attorney-in-fact with health care decision-making authority. In this way the attorney-in-fact will have some documented evidence of the principals's wishes which will add credibility to any decision which he/she might make on the principal's behalf.

Discussion of an advance directive with one's physician and family is vital while the document is being prepared. The physician can give the author information which is essential to the document and can communicate to the author his/her commitment to honoring it. Family members can discuss differences of opinion about the decisions reflected in the document and, hopefully, resolve those differences before the advance directive needs to be applied. Copies of the final advance directive should be given to one's physician and appropriate family members or significant others.

Any advance directive should be reviewed periodically to be sure that it represents the current thinking of the author and conforms to state law. It should be revised when it is appropriate to do so.

It is nor necessary to address all of the items listed in the outline. This may be too much detail for many individuals. They may eliminate whatever they choose not to include. Other may add more specificity to this general orientation. It is strongly suggested, however, that those writing an advance directive pay special attention to addressing the items related to the values history (#5), the quality of life (#5d), outcomes (##7 and 8), pain control (##2d, 10h, and 11h), medically administered nutrition and hydration (##10f and 11f), and CPR/DNR (##10k and 11k).

The rule of thumb is that the more specific and credible the document is, the greater the likelihood of its being honored.

1. Purpose of the document.

2. Awareness of current disease process. 3. Awareness of the aging process. 4. Possible disease or disability. 5. Values history. 6. Basic understandings. 7. Outcomes desired from interventions. 8. Outcomes not desired from interventions. 9. Where, in 7 and 8, do the following fit? 10. Treatments desired. 11. Treatments not desired (Same list as in 10). 12. Unexpected but reasonably possible events which can occur. 13. Reconciliation with dying.

This document may also be found  in the Bioethics Handbook, pages 211-215.